10 things that you shouldn’t say in an office

Office jargon has been around since the first office was created and is frankly pretty annoying; it's an assault on the ears even to hear it. If you’re a cricket fan then the chances are you have played Boycott Bingo or if you too are one of those frustrated employees then the chances are that you’ve been to a meeting and played "Buzzword Bingo" using cards with expressions like "outside the box" or "on the same page."

Fortunately, such jargon goes out of style pretty quickly. I haven't heard "going forward" for a while but equally on the flip side, old expressions are almost immediately replaced by new, even more irritating ones.

Over a cup of coffee one morning we “brainstormed” the jargon we hear on a daily basis and here are a few of the results, with the odd example.

Leverage. Deployment of an insufficient amount of something to do that which was previously done with much more. Example: "After the layoffs, we can leverage our staff of three to cover the entire country".

Reach out. This one really is my pet hate for so many reasons. To deliver news. To talk or connect with someone. Example: "I wanted to reach out to you about my next job". No you don’t, you want to talk to me!!

It is what it is. Meaning: Get used to it.

Viral. So prevalent that it has almost became the word of 2013. Example: "Twitter has gone viral".

Game changer. A catalyst that will transform a frog into a prince or vice-versa. Example: "Getting indicted for fraud was a game changer for Joe Bloggs".

Disconnect. A situation in which you wanted jam, but someone gave you peanut butter. Example: "There is a disconnect between what the consumer wants and what we intend to provide".

Value-add. A gain, usually financial. Example:

Circle back. See you again and again and again whether or not you want to be seen. Example: "The stalker abided by the court's restraining order but then circled back to hang out by the house".

Socialise. Ram the idea down their throats. Example: "We need to socialise to our patients our practice of closing the doctor's office every day for two hours at lunch." In other words, “Call an ambulance”!

Cutting edge. Oh dear, my second pet hate. So modern, it's to die for. Example: "Their offering is so cutting edge that they will take the country by storm".

Now that these expressions have been officially identified as irritating jargon, you might want to give them up, or add to the list! Unless your boss is planning to circle back to reach out to interface and socialise to your value-add. What can I tell you? It is what it is.

As ever we’re keen to hear from you, let us know your thoughts at blog@chestertongray.com or tweet us at @chestertongray

Five personalities that might wreck your meeting!

When I secured my first “proper” job I don’t think that I was really aware of what the ‘management’ actually got up to or that they were never available for me to talk to because they were in meetings; in fact they always had a looming presence!

These days the world has moved on and it doesn’t really seem to matter who you work for, whether you’re a small family firm or whether you work in a large corporation, the chances are that you spend a lot of time in meetings.

And if you do spend a lot of time in meetings, you soon see human nature displayed in its full glory as your colleagues and customers jockey for attention, claim credit for anything they can and prey, Darwinian-style, on weaker members of the tribe.

So, next time that you are called to a meeting, here are five kinds of people that can make things go awry fast -- and a few thoughts on how to deal with them:

1. The bully. Speaks loudly and speaks for softer-spoken team members, apparently deciding that they are unable to make their points for themselves. Actually says things like "that's a stupid idea" to someone whose ideas aren't stupid. Feel free to treat this person like the primary schoolchild whose behaviour they’re channelling. If you let them get away with their infractions, they’re only going to get worse.

2. The non sequitur. This person needs to be heard and either doesn't understand or doesn't care that the ground rules of a discussion require at least some relation between discussion points. As a counterpoint you could interrupt swiftly with "That's an interesting point. Let's note that and move back to our current agenda." If you don't have a timed meeting agenda, then you're inviting this behaviour.

3. The would-be visionary. This person is a frustrated philosopher who has a nasty habit of sending the discussion down a rabbit hole by proposing ideas that sound important the first time you hear them, but rapidly leave you cringing by the time they’ve brought them up in a third or fourth meeting. Respond with humour if you can but it’s key to bring the discussion back to your line.

4. The constant questioner. This person assumes that asking questions about everything the speaker says makes them sound smart and attentive, not realising (or caring) how distracting it is for the others in the meeting. Unless the person is your boss, this person usually turns out not to have any real questions once he or she realises it won't be possible to turn the meeting into a Socratic dialogue.

5. The rambler. Now we all know of these! Occasionally makes good points, but buries each nugget in 10 minutes of fluff. Unless you want your 20-minute meeting to last an hour, get adept at asking a question that cuts to the chase.

Those are my thoughts, how do you keep bad meeting personalities in check?

As ever we’re keen to hear from you, let us know your thoughts at blog@chestertongray.com or tweet us at @chestertongray

‘Tis the season to be job hunting!

The first “proper” working Monday of the New Year is supposed to be the day when disgruntled employees finally decide after the Christmas and New Year break that enough is enough and that it’s time to look for a new job. And ideally a pay rise!!

The big job boards report increased activity, particularly at lunch time (odd that!) and at about 6pm when candidates get home and log on having said hello to the wife/husband/kids/dog/cats/hamster and start trawling for the net for their next career move.
The other incentive to move is that many companies are now in a new financial year and as a consequence have the budgets to hire the next round of talent that’s coming onto the market.

So, if that sounds like you today, then head over to www.chestertongray.com and talk to one of the Directors or consultants about the roles that we are recruiting or if you’re a company come and discuss how we work and can help you unearth your next superstar.

5 Questions great candidates ask at an interview

Whenever we pitch for a new assignment we always discuss the interview stages that the client will go through as part of the recruitment process. Normally they’re all pretty similar; very occasionally there is the odd assessment centre thrown in, but by and large little seems to have changed over the last twenty years or so. Which got us into thinking about the process from the candidate’s perspective.

Having discussed post interview feedback with a number of them, it appears interview techniques haven’t changed much either and the phase of the interview that still seems to stump far too many candidates is when the client turns the tables and asks: "Do you have any questions for me?"

Either candidates haven’t planned ahead or they have over planned. Most candidates don't actually care about the answers; they just hope to make themselves look good by asking "smart" questions. To them, what they ask is more important than the answer.

Great candidates ask questions they want answered because they're evaluating the interviewer, the company--and whether they really want to work for the management.

Here are five questions great candidates ask:

What do you expect me to accomplish in the first 60 to 90 days?
Great candidates want to hit the ground running. They don't want to spend weeks or months "getting to know the organisation." They want to make a difference--right away.

What are the common attributes of your top performers?
Great candidates also want to be great long-term employees. Every organisation is different, and so are the key qualities of top performers in those organisations. Maybe top performers work longer hours. Maybe creativity is more important than methodology. Maybe constantly landing new customers in new markets is more important than building long-term customer relationships. Maybe it's a willingness to spend the same amount of time educating an entry-level customer as helping an enthusiast who wants high-end equipment. Great candidates want to know, because 1) they want to know if they fit, and 2) if they do fit, they want to be a top performer.

What are a few things that really drive results for the company?
Employees are investments, and every employee should generate a positive return on his or her salary. (Otherwise why are they on the payroll?)

In every job some activities make a bigger difference than others. The HR team need to fill vacant positions... but what everyone really wants is for HR to find the right candidates because that results in higher retention rates, lower training costs, and better overall productivity.

Companies need its IT people to perform effective repairs... but what candidates really want is for the techies to identify ways to solve problems and provide other benefits--in short, to generate additional sales. Great candidates want to know what truly makes a difference.
They know helping the company succeed means they succeed as well.

What do employees do in their spare time?
Happy employees 1) like what they do and 2) like the people they work with.

Granted this is a tough question to answer. Unless the company is really small, all any interviewer can do is speak in generalities. What's important is that the candidate wants to make sure they have a reasonable chance of fitting in--because great job candidates usually have options.

How do you plan to deal with...?
Every business faces a major challenge: technological changes, competitors entering the market, shifting economic trends... there's rarely a Warren Buffett moat protecting a small business. So while a candidate may see the company as a stepping-stone, they still hope for growth and advancement... and if they do eventually leave, they want it to be on their terms and not because it was forced out of business. A great candidate doesn't just want to know what you think; they want to know what you plan to do--and how they will fit into those plans.

As ever we would like to hear your thoughts; from either side of the desk. Have interview techniques changed or stagnated? Do candidates ask mundane or killer questions? Do clients prepare themselves for the interview as well as candidates? What would you change about the whole process?

Please feel free to go to www.chestertongray.com and let us know your thoughts.

'Thugs and druggies'

Ok, so it’s a bit of a sensationalist headline to start a blog but according to a number of articles recently it’s what job interviewers think when they see a tattoo




What in many cases starts off as a youthful, spur-of-the moment decision to get a tattoo can in some cases damage people’s career prospects for life.



Research presented to the British Sociological Association found that no matter how intelligent and articulate a job applicant is, if they have a visible tattoo, most would-be employers will secretly rule them out as looking “dirty” and “unsavoury” or even “repugnant”.



Even amongst those employers who do not have a personal objection to body art, many would think twice about taking on someone with a tattoo because they fear it would damage their corporate image.



But the study adds that those stuck with a tattoo from youth could turn it to their advantage – as long as they want to become a prison officer. And it concludes that a small number of types of tattoo can be seen as conveying a positive image, such as regimental insignia for military veterans, which can be a “badge of honour”.



In a paper, being presented to the association’s annual conference on workplace issues, Dr Andrew Timming of St Andrew’s University School of Management, set out findings from a series of interviews with employers about perceptions of body art.



He spoke to a cross section of managers from organisations including a hotel, bank, city council, prison, university and bookseller.



Most said that tattoos carried a clear “stigma” for employers, with several expressing strong views on the subject. “Respondents expressed concern that visibly tattooed workers may be perceived by customers to be ‘abhorrent’, ‘repugnant’, ‘unsavoury’ and ‘untidy’,” said Dr Timming. “It was surmised that customers might project a negative service experience based on stereotypes that tattooed people are thugs and druggies.”



One manager interviewed told Dr Timming: “Tattoos are the first thing they [fellow recruiters] talk about when the person has gone out of the door.”



Dr Timming said bosses’ concerns were usually based on perceptions of what their organisation’s clients might think. “Hiring managers realise that, ultimately, it does not matter what they think of tattoos – what really matters, instead, is how customers might perceive employees with visible tattoos,” he said.



“The one qualification to this argument is there are certain industries in which tattoos may be a desirable characteristic in a job interview. “For example, an HR manager at a prison noted that tattoos on guards can be ‘something to talk about’ and ‘an in’ that you need to make a connection with the prisoners.”



But he added that some images were easier for employers to forgive than others.

While in many cases flowers or small animals might just be acceptable for some, those most likely to prove a definite turn-off included spider’s webs on people’s necks, tears tattooed on to their faces, guns and sexual imagery.



Have you ever discounted a candidate because they had tattoos or feel that as a candidate you’ve been overlooked because of one? Let us know your thoughts at www.chestertongray.com

The high cost of bad recruitment

A few days ago I worked out that I’m now in my twenty sixth year in the recruitment industry and I think that it’s fair to say that I’ve done my fair share of recruiting. And I can tell you with absolute certainty that one of the most costly, time-consuming blunders a business can make is picking the wrong person for the job.


How costly? The industry employment statistics currently estimates that the average cost of a bad hiring decision can equal 30% of the individual’s first-year potential earnings. That means a single bad hire with an annual income of £50,000 can equal a potential £15,000 loss for the employer.

On top of the financial cost the loss is compounded by the impact of a bad hire on productivity and team morale. One subpar employee can throw an entire department into disarray. Team members end up investing their own time into training someone who has no future with the company.

One of America’s top CEO’s has estimated that his own bad hires have cost the company well over $100 million. As a consequence of that he now offers new recruits a $2000 bonus to quit after their first week on the job!!

As the search and recruitment firm we’re not in that position but here are a few techniques we believe to be effective in preventing recruitment disasters:

1. Over-prepare: A job candidate isn’t the only one who should prepare before the interview.

When you’re recruiting employees for specific, technical roles, it can be hard to prepare the right interview questions. It’s useful to find an expert in the candidate’s specific field and get some advice on the best questions to ask. This is worth the extra effort, even if it means consulting someone outside your company.

So if you’re recruiting for an IT role, find and talk to an IT person about what makes a good team member. Then, add three specific IT-related questions to your interview. Don’t be afraid to loop back with your expert to get their feedback on the responses.

2. The secretary test: Great collaborators don’t pull rank.

All of the candidates who we invite here to meet us for an assignment are initially met by our team PA. Over the years it always surprises us to find out that a number of the candidates who had been personable and courteous to us were rude to her.

The ability to work well with others is a skill that benefits any workplace. An obvious way to gauge this is to contact the candidate’s references. But, why not take it a step further and dig into a candidate’s social media profiles? Switched on HR departments are already looking through candidates’ Facebook and LinkedIn profiles. I recommend going as far as checking a candidate’s Twitter feed to gain insight. You never know what you might find!

3. The curveball: Hide an unexpected question in the fine print.

We believe that the most effective employees are those who take the time to read the fine print. During one assignment a client mentioned that they write a small, unconventional request into a job application. This can be something as innocuous as, “Please list three websites you visit often.” In their view, candidates who overlook this question or didn’t provide a full answer aren’t worth interviewing.

Why? People tend to be the most alert and thoughtful during this initial stage of the job application process. If they can’t pay attention to details here, how will they perform once they’re on board?

When it comes to recruitment, Steve Jobs once said: "I noticed that the dynamic range between what an average person could accomplish and what the best person could accomplish was 50 or 100 to 1. Given that, you're well advised to go after the cream of the cream. ...A small team of A+ players can run circles around a giant team of B and C players."

How do you find your crème de la crème?

If you would like to discuss how you we can work with you on your key recruitment issues then please contact one of the Directors at www.chestertongray.com

Why your emails are too long -- and how to improve them

Every day my colleagues and I receive hundreds of emails; as I’m sure that you do. Some are vital, others less so and many are simply irritating. Frustratingly they come in all shapes and sizes, there is no one size fits all template. Rumour has it that email is the source of, and solution to, all of life's problems.




Certainly, the modern business world could not exist without the ability to exchange messages instantly, but email also causes all sorts of communication problems. For starters, there's way too much of it. Second, much of the email we get is too long. Long email creates bottlenecks in our in-boxes and more often than not goes unread because it seems too complex.



As with all things, ask a hundred people a question and you will get a hundred answers, however, here are some of the top reasons why your mail is too long, and what you should do to change it:



You don't know exactly what you're trying to say. It’s a truism that writing more isn't going to cover up the fact that you are lacking knowledge. We also find that candidates write too much at the start of an email because they don't know how to phrase what's on their mind. I suppose that it's a form of clearing one's throat. The solution? Re-read you’re your opening paragraph and if it doesn't get to the point right away, delete it.



You're sending spam. Who's on your "To" and CC lines? Do all those people need to be there? If not, prune the list. Resist the temptation to send email for its own sake, especially in a corporate environment.



You're forwarding the whole thread. Scan the forwarded bit below your new message. Do you need to include the entire thread, dating all the way back to the invention of computers? Some context might be essential, but cut as much as possible. Otherwise, it'll feel like the recipient needs to read a novel to understand the issue.



It should be more than one email. If your email is really long, take a look and see if there are multiple action items, projects or requests included within. If so, you'll probably get a better response by sending several shorter, to the point emails.



You're not self-editing. Don't just write and click "send." Yes, you're busy, and yes, you need to send a lot of mail. But reading, thinking about and editing your email before you send it can help you trim down your messages and make them more understandable. It might also mean that those you receive back take the same attitude and make your life easier!



As ever your thoughts on what makes a bad/good email are more than welcome.



If you would like to talk with a consultant then please go to www.chestertongray.com