Whenever we pitch for a new assignment we always discuss the interview stages that the client will go through as part of the recruitment process. Normally they’re all pretty similar; very occasionally there is the odd assessment centre thrown in, but by and large little seems to have changed over the last twenty years or so. Which got us into thinking about the process from the candidate’s perspective.
Having discussed post interview feedback with a number of them, it appears interview techniques haven’t changed much either and the phase of the interview that still seems to stump far too many candidates is when the client turns the tables and asks: "Do you have any questions for me?"
Either candidates haven’t planned ahead or they have over planned. Most candidates don't actually care about the answers; they just hope to make themselves look good by asking "smart" questions. To them, what they ask is more important than the answer.
Great candidates ask questions they want answered because they're evaluating the interviewer, the company--and whether they really want to work for the management.
Here are five questions great candidates ask:
What do you expect me to accomplish in the first 60 to 90 days?
Great candidates want to hit the ground running. They don't want to spend weeks or months "getting to know the organisation." They want to make a difference--right away.
What are the common attributes of your top performers?
Great candidates also want to be great long-term employees. Every organisation is different, and so are the key qualities of top performers in those organisations. Maybe top performers work longer hours. Maybe creativity is more important than methodology. Maybe constantly landing new customers in new markets is more important than building long-term customer relationships. Maybe it's a willingness to spend the same amount of time educating an entry-level customer as helping an enthusiast who wants high-end equipment. Great candidates want to know, because 1) they want to know if they fit, and 2) if they do fit, they want to be a top performer.
What are a few things that really drive results for the company?
Employees are investments, and every employee should generate a positive return on his or her salary. (Otherwise why are they on the payroll?)
In every job some activities make a bigger difference than others. The HR team need to fill vacant positions... but what everyone really wants is for HR to find the right candidates because that results in higher retention rates, lower training costs, and better overall productivity.
Companies need its IT people to perform effective repairs... but what candidates really want is for the techies to identify ways to solve problems and provide other benefits--in short, to generate additional sales. Great candidates want to know what truly makes a difference.
They know helping the company succeed means they succeed as well.
What do employees do in their spare time?
Happy employees 1) like what they do and 2) like the people they work with.
Granted this is a tough question to answer. Unless the company is really small, all any interviewer can do is speak in generalities. What's important is that the candidate wants to make sure they have a reasonable chance of fitting in--because great job candidates usually have options.
How do you plan to deal with...?
Every business faces a major challenge: technological changes, competitors entering the market, shifting economic trends... there's rarely a Warren Buffett moat protecting a small business. So while a candidate may see the company as a stepping-stone, they still hope for growth and advancement... and if they do eventually leave, they want it to be on their terms and not because it was forced out of business. A great candidate doesn't just want to know what you think; they want to know what you plan to do--and how they will fit into those plans.
As ever we would like to hear your thoughts; from either side of the desk. Have interview techniques changed or stagnated? Do candidates ask mundane or killer questions? Do clients prepare themselves for the interview as well as candidates? What would you change about the whole process?
Please feel free to go to www.chestertongray.com and let us know your thoughts.
Showing posts with label line managers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label line managers. Show all posts
Friday, 20 September 2013
Friday, 11 May 2012
How NOT to fire someone: 5 common mistakes
Unless you're a natural bully, firing someone is never fun. It is, of course, a necessary part of being a manager, and it's a skill that can be honed. The worst mistake, according to experts? Going through the motions like a robot. Act like a human being. There is a very good chance that one day it may be you on the other side of the desk and you'd appreciate being handled like one.
Here are 5 common firing mistakes. Avoid them, and you'll become as proficient as possible in the skill of laying someone off with respect:
Not looking your soon-to-be ex-employee in the eye One of the best ways to show respect is to make eye contact. This is incredibly important - there's another human being across the table from you and being human at this difficult time will make a huge difference to them after they've left and recall how this was handled, especially if it’s their first time. It can scar people for years to come.
Being cagey about your reasons Explaining your reasoning -- briefly -- is the fastest way to give this difficult situation a silver lining. Done the right way you can help catapult someone's career instead of paralyse it. By being open, you can help them excel in a different environment if they don't fit yours.
Being too friendly about it It is entirely possible to sack someone and to be so nice about it that they don't realise they have actually been fired. Getting fired is emotionally very tough, but you can soften the blow by making your message clear and as concise as possible. This means starting right away with your unfortunate message, and then adding any "thank you for your contributions". Of course, this latter comment will depend upon the situation.
Not involving HR Whether your human resources team is ever-present or stays behind the scenes, this is one of those key times that it can often help to use your HR team. If you can have an HR Manager in the meeting with you or waiting elsewhere, it allows the person being terminated to talk afterward with the HR person who can explain issues such as final pay and any ongoing benefits, that will become very important to the individual.
Not shutting up After giving someone this difficult news, give them 30 seconds to digest the blow. Continuing talking while the message is being processed doesn't help them and can certainly hinder the person's ability to get through this moment. Finally, avoid getting into a very detailed discussion of the situation (beyond a brief explanation). By doing so there is a very good chance that you could unintentionally say something that may come back and bite you at a later occasion. Having an HR person present who understands the legal niceties can prevent you from saying too much, or too little.
In my experience almost everyone has either been through this situation or knows someone who has, so as ever, the team at Chesterton Gray would like to hear your thought. www.chestertongray.com
Here are 5 common firing mistakes. Avoid them, and you'll become as proficient as possible in the skill of laying someone off with respect:
Not looking your soon-to-be ex-employee in the eye One of the best ways to show respect is to make eye contact. This is incredibly important - there's another human being across the table from you and being human at this difficult time will make a huge difference to them after they've left and recall how this was handled, especially if it’s their first time. It can scar people for years to come.
Being cagey about your reasons Explaining your reasoning -- briefly -- is the fastest way to give this difficult situation a silver lining. Done the right way you can help catapult someone's career instead of paralyse it. By being open, you can help them excel in a different environment if they don't fit yours.
Being too friendly about it It is entirely possible to sack someone and to be so nice about it that they don't realise they have actually been fired. Getting fired is emotionally very tough, but you can soften the blow by making your message clear and as concise as possible. This means starting right away with your unfortunate message, and then adding any "thank you for your contributions". Of course, this latter comment will depend upon the situation.
Not involving HR Whether your human resources team is ever-present or stays behind the scenes, this is one of those key times that it can often help to use your HR team. If you can have an HR Manager in the meeting with you or waiting elsewhere, it allows the person being terminated to talk afterward with the HR person who can explain issues such as final pay and any ongoing benefits, that will become very important to the individual.
Not shutting up After giving someone this difficult news, give them 30 seconds to digest the blow. Continuing talking while the message is being processed doesn't help them and can certainly hinder the person's ability to get through this moment. Finally, avoid getting into a very detailed discussion of the situation (beyond a brief explanation). By doing so there is a very good chance that you could unintentionally say something that may come back and bite you at a later occasion. Having an HR person present who understands the legal niceties can prevent you from saying too much, or too little.
In my experience almost everyone has either been through this situation or knows someone who has, so as ever, the team at Chesterton Gray would like to hear your thought. www.chestertongray.com
Friday, 13 April 2012
The 10% fee and why it doesn’t work.
Year after year, in challenging economic times, the mantra of cost down is bashed out across almost every business stream and the recruitment world is not immune from it. Those of us who have been around the block once or twice understand the need for businesses to cut costs but also see the number of times that it can actually do you a disservice.
In my best Max Bygraves; let me tell you a story.
Three years ago I won my first retained assignment from a client that I had been pursuing on and off for a couple of years. Good job and an interesting assignment to get my teeth into. As I approached finalising the shortlist they signed off a second role at a slightly reduced fee. I’ve no problem with as it makes sense, so much so that in fact I filled both roles and they recruited a third from the first shortlist. Hurrah!
However, last year as the sector tightened HR & Procurement decided to implement a European PSL and would only work with agencies/recruitment firms/search firms that would agree 10% success only fees.
I declined.
In December they signed off six roles in a new division which went out to their preferred agencies. Much to their surprise eight weeks later they hadn’t received a CV, let alone interviewed a candidate and senior management were jumping up and down on the line managers because the roles were still empty and the projects now really needed the staff.
So why has this situation happened?
Rightly or wrongly recruitment is seen as an overhead cost rather than an investment, with little or no understanding from the procurement and HR teams as to how the agencies operate.
The consultants in the agencies lead very regimented lives in the way that they work and are very heavily revenue targeted, which is why there is such a high turnover of staff in agencies.
Once you send them the 10% fee based job description they will work on it briefly until another client (maybe only hours later) asks them to work on a role with a 20% or more fee, so day by day your role slips remorselessly down the pecking order until quite frankly you’re forgotten in the desire to produce revenue and not be fired takes over. And then there is the other side of the equation. Let’s say that by chance the consultant does find a candidate who matches your brief; are you going to see the CV? Well not necessarily no. Why? Because the consultant’s manager will ask where the consultant is going to send “send out” the CV to and once again the need to satisfy revenue demands takes priority. The manager will ‘encourage’ the consultant to service the 20%+ fee clients rather than the 10% fee client.
Result? Eight weeks later the vacancy still hasn’t be serviced.
To return to my client: Eventually I agreed a 20% fee and in one month had the first three roles in order of priority at offer stage with a one role/one candidate success rate and yes they’re still waiting to hear from their agencies!
Not having people in place for key roles is as every bit, or more, expensive on the bottom lines as paying for the right recruitment firm to find those people.
Invest in expertise and specialist knowledge and it will deliver accordingly.
If you would like to talk with a Director or Consultant about how we can work with you then please contact us at www.chestertongray.com
In my best Max Bygraves; let me tell you a story.
Three years ago I won my first retained assignment from a client that I had been pursuing on and off for a couple of years. Good job and an interesting assignment to get my teeth into. As I approached finalising the shortlist they signed off a second role at a slightly reduced fee. I’ve no problem with as it makes sense, so much so that in fact I filled both roles and they recruited a third from the first shortlist. Hurrah!
However, last year as the sector tightened HR & Procurement decided to implement a European PSL and would only work with agencies/recruitment firms/search firms that would agree 10% success only fees.
I declined.
In December they signed off six roles in a new division which went out to their preferred agencies. Much to their surprise eight weeks later they hadn’t received a CV, let alone interviewed a candidate and senior management were jumping up and down on the line managers because the roles were still empty and the projects now really needed the staff.
So why has this situation happened?
Rightly or wrongly recruitment is seen as an overhead cost rather than an investment, with little or no understanding from the procurement and HR teams as to how the agencies operate.
The consultants in the agencies lead very regimented lives in the way that they work and are very heavily revenue targeted, which is why there is such a high turnover of staff in agencies.
Once you send them the 10% fee based job description they will work on it briefly until another client (maybe only hours later) asks them to work on a role with a 20% or more fee, so day by day your role slips remorselessly down the pecking order until quite frankly you’re forgotten in the desire to produce revenue and not be fired takes over. And then there is the other side of the equation. Let’s say that by chance the consultant does find a candidate who matches your brief; are you going to see the CV? Well not necessarily no. Why? Because the consultant’s manager will ask where the consultant is going to send “send out” the CV to and once again the need to satisfy revenue demands takes priority. The manager will ‘encourage’ the consultant to service the 20%+ fee clients rather than the 10% fee client.
Result? Eight weeks later the vacancy still hasn’t be serviced.
To return to my client: Eventually I agreed a 20% fee and in one month had the first three roles in order of priority at offer stage with a one role/one candidate success rate and yes they’re still waiting to hear from their agencies!
Not having people in place for key roles is as every bit, or more, expensive on the bottom lines as paying for the right recruitment firm to find those people.
Invest in expertise and specialist knowledge and it will deliver accordingly.
If you would like to talk with a Director or Consultant about how we can work with you then please contact us at www.chestertongray.com
Friday, 7 October 2011
5 Things you should never say in a job interview
Sometimes it feels as though I’m stuck in Groundhog Day where everyday, or an event, is a repeat of a previous one. Earlier this week I overheard a colleague having to explain a few basic interviews techniques to a candidate who has changed jobs several times before but who plainly felt the need for guidance and reassurance.
We all know that job interviews are never easy and they’re especially stressful when opportunities are so few and far between, as they are at the moment with the European economy going through its travails.
When you have at last secured an interview, the single most important thing you can do is prepare and practice, by doing both a run-through with a savvy friend, and then doing a self-review. This practice should help settle your nerves and help you work on weaknesses. So, on the back of some surreptitious eavesdropping here are 5 things never to say to the line or recruiting manager:
1. Something they’ve heard a million times before
Some people just love interviewing others and spurring them to be creative and compelling in their answers. Others ask the same dull questions they’ve been asking for years. Whether your interviewer is inspiring or barely conscious, you’ll need to come up with new answers to what are likely old questions. Never be cliché. For instance, don’t tell the interviewer you are a people person. Prepare and practice your talking points prior, and you’ll be less likely to rely on stock answers.
2. A request for any kind of concessions
You can’t do overtime because your children’s day care finishes at 5. You’d like to work from home part-time because you have a new puppy. You need an ergonomically-sound mouse and phone set-up. You’re not so into working on weekends, holidays, or your birthday. Especially in a first interview, you want them to want you — badly. Once they do, you can then ask for what you want, which includes specific questions about salary, benefits, or holiday time.
3. Anything that shows you’re over or under ambitious
Inevitably you will be asked the question “Where do you see yourself in 5 years?” A question which can make certain candidates answer too honestly (”I have no idea!”) or show their true colours (”Hopefully, in your job…haha…”). Helping you find your true passion isn’t really their problem, and the fact that you want to advance ASAP can also raise concerns that you’ll jump ship quickly.
4. Anything negative
You probably know better than to criticise your former boss. But you should be positive throughout the interview process. Don’t be negative about anything including your previous office, your old company’s personnel policies, traffic on the way to the interview, or the weather. That said, there are certain times to be constructively critical of your former corporation as well as the company with which you’re interviewing. The key is constructive input. What can you do to improve their situation with your skills and experience, instead of merely mocking it?
5. That you have no weaknesses
Yes, the question “What is your biggest weakness?” is incredibly annoying, boring, and irritating (see “Something they’ve heard a million times before,” above). But asserting that you are a perfect human being isn’t the answer either. That way you certainly won’t come across as credible if you say that you have no weaknesses. Ideally you should talk about a real weakness that is not central to the position that you are seeking and show how you have overcome that weakness. This will help the employer see you as a three-dimensional potential employee, instead of as a two-dimensional resume.
I truly don’t believe that any of the above is ground breaking news to the majority of job seekers, but equally it never does any harm to refresh one’s knowledge before you find yourself in the one interview situation that you didn’t want to be in.
As ever, thoughts and input more than welcome.
www.chestertongray.com
We all know that job interviews are never easy and they’re especially stressful when opportunities are so few and far between, as they are at the moment with the European economy going through its travails.
When you have at last secured an interview, the single most important thing you can do is prepare and practice, by doing both a run-through with a savvy friend, and then doing a self-review. This practice should help settle your nerves and help you work on weaknesses. So, on the back of some surreptitious eavesdropping here are 5 things never to say to the line or recruiting manager:
1. Something they’ve heard a million times before
Some people just love interviewing others and spurring them to be creative and compelling in their answers. Others ask the same dull questions they’ve been asking for years. Whether your interviewer is inspiring or barely conscious, you’ll need to come up with new answers to what are likely old questions. Never be cliché. For instance, don’t tell the interviewer you are a people person. Prepare and practice your talking points prior, and you’ll be less likely to rely on stock answers.
2. A request for any kind of concessions
You can’t do overtime because your children’s day care finishes at 5. You’d like to work from home part-time because you have a new puppy. You need an ergonomically-sound mouse and phone set-up. You’re not so into working on weekends, holidays, or your birthday. Especially in a first interview, you want them to want you — badly. Once they do, you can then ask for what you want, which includes specific questions about salary, benefits, or holiday time.
3. Anything that shows you’re over or under ambitious
Inevitably you will be asked the question “Where do you see yourself in 5 years?” A question which can make certain candidates answer too honestly (”I have no idea!”) or show their true colours (”Hopefully, in your job…haha…”). Helping you find your true passion isn’t really their problem, and the fact that you want to advance ASAP can also raise concerns that you’ll jump ship quickly.
4. Anything negative
You probably know better than to criticise your former boss. But you should be positive throughout the interview process. Don’t be negative about anything including your previous office, your old company’s personnel policies, traffic on the way to the interview, or the weather. That said, there are certain times to be constructively critical of your former corporation as well as the company with which you’re interviewing. The key is constructive input. What can you do to improve their situation with your skills and experience, instead of merely mocking it?
5. That you have no weaknesses
Yes, the question “What is your biggest weakness?” is incredibly annoying, boring, and irritating (see “Something they’ve heard a million times before,” above). But asserting that you are a perfect human being isn’t the answer either. That way you certainly won’t come across as credible if you say that you have no weaknesses. Ideally you should talk about a real weakness that is not central to the position that you are seeking and show how you have overcome that weakness. This will help the employer see you as a three-dimensional potential employee, instead of as a two-dimensional resume.
I truly don’t believe that any of the above is ground breaking news to the majority of job seekers, but equally it never does any harm to refresh one’s knowledge before you find yourself in the one interview situation that you didn’t want to be in.
As ever, thoughts and input more than welcome.
www.chestertongray.com
Thursday, 21 October 2010
So just what is the point of a PSL?
The Preferred Supplier List (PSL) has been around in one form or another for as long as anyone in this office can recall - and that’s actually quite a long time!
Over the years InterSearch in the UK has been on a few and come off a few, both through clients and our own choice. Interestingly there is a vast difference between those sectors where all the companies seem to have them and others where they are few and far between. The pharmaceutical sector falls very firmly in the former camp and making in-roads into these companies appears on the surface nigh on impossible,
My colleague who works in the sector has found that once you delve a little deeper invariably there is a difference of opinion between the line managers who are becoming increasingly frustrated by their roles being unfilled, whilst those charged with recruitment refuse to go outside of the PSL, which patently isn’t delivering the expected results. The subsequent request to us to “just send us some CV’s” is met with a polite decline.
So, back to the original question; What is the point of the PSL?
The simple answer in most cases seems to be cost. We were recently asked to complete a long PSL application by one of Europe’s largest distribution/logistics firms that focused solely on lowest cost without a single reference to delivery methods, quality standards or relationships between our two firms.
For many companies they are a great idea and if created and managed properly they can work to the benefit of both parties, but equally many companies have scrapped them and decided to focus on closer less formal and more successful relationships with their search firms.
If you are interested in talking with any of the heads of our practice groups then please contact us at www.intersearchuk.com
Over the years InterSearch in the UK has been on a few and come off a few, both through clients and our own choice. Interestingly there is a vast difference between those sectors where all the companies seem to have them and others where they are few and far between. The pharmaceutical sector falls very firmly in the former camp and making in-roads into these companies appears on the surface nigh on impossible,
My colleague who works in the sector has found that once you delve a little deeper invariably there is a difference of opinion between the line managers who are becoming increasingly frustrated by their roles being unfilled, whilst those charged with recruitment refuse to go outside of the PSL, which patently isn’t delivering the expected results. The subsequent request to us to “just send us some CV’s” is met with a polite decline.
So, back to the original question; What is the point of the PSL?
The simple answer in most cases seems to be cost. We were recently asked to complete a long PSL application by one of Europe’s largest distribution/logistics firms that focused solely on lowest cost without a single reference to delivery methods, quality standards or relationships between our two firms.
For many companies they are a great idea and if created and managed properly they can work to the benefit of both parties, but equally many companies have scrapped them and decided to focus on closer less formal and more successful relationships with their search firms.
If you are interested in talking with any of the heads of our practice groups then please contact us at www.intersearchuk.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
